Wednesday, August 31, 2011

Zapatistas: Letter from Marcos August 2011

Photo by Brenda Norrell
ZAPATISTA NATIONAL LIBERATION ARMY 

MEXICO.
July-August 2011.
To: Don Luis Villoro.
From: SupMarcos
Don Luis:

Receive greetings from all of us and a big hug from me. We hope you are in better health and that the pause in this exchange has been useful for attempting new proposals and reflections.

Although the current reality seems to rush headlong at a dizzying rate, a serious theoretical reflection should be capable of "freezing" a moment in order to discover tendencies within it that permit us, revealing its gestation, to see where it is going.

(And speaking of reality, I remember that it was in the Zapatista La Realidad where I suggested to Don Pablo Gonzalez Casanova an exchange: he should send me a packet of Pancrema biscuits, and I had to send him an alleged and improbable book of political theory (to call it something). Don Pablo complied, and the delayed walk of our calendar has prevented me from fulfilling my part of the exchange ... yet. But I think that in the coming rains there will be more words).

As perhaps has been insinuated in our correspondence (and in the letters of those who, generously, have joined the debate), theory, politics and ethics are intertwined in ways not too obvious.

We are certainly not discussing discovering or creating TRUTHS, those millstones that abound in the history of philosophy and its bastard children: religion, theory and politics.

I think we would agree that our efforts are aimed more towards trying to make the not-so evident but substantial lines stand out from those tasks.

"Downloading" theory into concrete analysis is one of the paths. Another is to anchor it in practice. But that practice is not being done in these epistles, as may be realized. So I think we should continue to insist on "anchoring" our theoretical reflections in concrete analysis or, more modestly, trying to limit their geographical and temporal coordinates. In other words, insisting that the words are spoken (written, in this case) from a specific place and time.

From one calendar and in one geography. 





I. The Local Mirror.

The year 2011, Chiapas, Mexico, the World.

And in this calendar and this geography, we continue attentive around here to what happens, what is said and, above all, to what is silenced.

We continue in resistance in our lands. The attacks against us continue from across the political spectrum. We are an example that it is possible for all the political parties to have a common goal. Sponsored by federal, state and municipal governments, all political parties attack us.

Prior to each attack or after it, there is a meeting between government officials and "social" or party leaders. Little is said, just enough to agree on a price and the method of payment.

Those who criticize our Zapatista position that "all politicians are alike" should take a trip around Chiapas. Although it is certain that they will say this is something strictly local, that this does not happen at the national level.

But the political class in Chiapas repeats, with local variations, the same ridiculous routines of pre-election times.

There is an internal settling of scores (just like among the criminal gangs), which in the political class they disguise as "justice". But everywhere it’s the same: to clear the path for the one who is elected this time. Everything that happens below is suspected of being a plot by one or more rivals. Everything that happens above is deformed or silenced.

With media policy to pay compliments, when it comes to Chiapas there is no difference between the press in the nation’s capital and in the state capital.

Can anyone seriously talk about justice in Chiapas when one of those responsible for the Acteal Massacre, namely Julio Cesar Ruiz Ferro, remains free? "Don’t worry, my president, let them kill each other, I'm going to send the public security services to pick up the dead", the then governor of Chiapas, Julio Cesar Ruiz Ferro, replied to Jacinto Arias Cruz, mayor of Chenalho, who warned of an imminent confrontation in Acteal on December 19, 1997. (See: Maria de la Luz Gonzalez, El Universal, December 18, 2007.)

And what about "croquettes" Roberto Albores Guillen, - the one responsible for the El Bosque killings, in addition to having built an empire of crime and corruption that now permits him to play second to Juan Sabines Guerrero and his "cock," the coleto Manuel Velasco, - returning to the governorship of Chiapas? (Speaking of "cocks," Will López Obrador ever account for having helped to recycle the worst of Chiapas PRI politics?)

Ah, the old rivalry between the ancient political classes of Comitan, San Cristobal de las Casas and Tuxtla Gutiérrez (indeed, its history can be found in the book by Antonio García de León, "Resistance and Utopia: memory of grievances and chronicle of revolts and prophecies which occurred in the province of Chiapas during the last five hundred years of its history" in the ERA editorial of the endearing Neus Espresate).

While inklings of a storm proliferate in the politics of the Chiapas of above, Juan Sabines Guerrero seems to continue to be committed to the line that gave so many failures before to "croquettes" Albores: to encourage groups, paramilitary and non-paramilitary, to assault the Zapatista communities, cloaking the power of criminal mafias with or without the alibi of a political party; maintaining impunity for close [friends]; simulation as a government programme.

A local and national press, well "oiled" with money, does not succeed in hiding, under the guise of unanimity, the internal war in the politics of above.

About all this, suffice it to point out the following: that the internal rules of the political class were broken a while ago. The jailers of yesterday are those jailed today, and the pursuers of today will be pursued tomorrow.

It’s not that they don’t cut "deals,” but they no longer have the ability to fulfill them.

And a political class that does not comply with its internal agreements is a corpse awaiting burial.

No, the political class of above understands nothing. But above all it does not understand the basics: your time is up.

Ruling stopped being a political function. Now the work par excellence of the rulers is simulation. More important than political and economic advisers are image, advertising and marketing advisors.

So behave the leaders in Mexico nowadays, while the local, regional and national realities go to pieces.

Neither can the government bulletins disguised as "reporting" and "journalistic notes" manage to cover up the economic crisis: in the principal cities of real Chiapas begin to appear and grow destitution and more marginal “jobs.” Poverty that seemed to be unique to rural communities begins to increase in urban areas of the Mexican Southeast.

Just like in the rest of national territory.

Does it seem like I'm talking about the politics of above on the national level and not the local level?

Ah, the fragments of the broken mirror, irremediably broken ... 




II. An epitaph for a political class or for a Nation?
When Felipe Calderón Hinojosa, (who became president through the - now confessed - crime of Elba Esther Gordillo), disguised as a tourist guide so that people other than the military and the police would come to Mexico, looked out at the Cave of the Swallows in Aqusimón, San Luis Potosí, and shouted out “Oh my God!” (http://mexico.cnn.com/nacional/2011/08/17/calderon-promueve-destinos-turisticos-en-el-programa-the-royal-tour), he could very well say the same thing if he looked out at the hole the country has fallen into during his administration.
According to statistics revealed by the National Council for the Evaluation of Social Development Policy (CONEVAL), the number of poor people in Mexico has increased from 48.8 to 53 million. Almost half the Mexican population lives in poverty. Almost 12 million people live in extreme poverty.
And if you study the maps of CONEVAL itself, you could realize that the marks of poverty, which used to be confined mainly to the South and South-Eastern states of Mexico (Guerrero, Oaxaca, Chiapas), are now spreading to the Northern states as well.
The prices for basic items have doubled and trebled during the last 6 years.

Variation in the increase in prices of some products

PRODUCT Increase from 1/12/06 to 01/3/11 Price in 2006 Price in 2011

1 Avocado 239.04% $12.09 $28.90
2 Lemon 230.45% $6.01 $13.85
3 Sugar 199.31% $7.24 $14.43
4 Beans 199.50% $10.03 $20.01
5 Tomato 141.74% $9.75 $13.82
6 Eggs 144.65% $11.58 $16.75
7 Cheese 193.55% $40.77 $78.91
8 White bread 175.00% $1.00 $1.75
9 Tortilla 153.26% $6.74 $10.33

Minimum wage 22.90% $48.67 $59.82


Taken from Centre for Multidisciplinary Analysis (CAM) "Report of Investigation No 90 Mexico: Results of economic policy applied to the workers (2006-2011)"


According to data from the The Centre for Multidisciplinary Analysis, in order to have enough money to buy the recommended basic food basket during the first year of Felipe Calderón Hinojosa’s administration, it was necessary to work for 13 hours and 19 minutes per day. Five years later, in 2011, it would be necessary to work for 22 hours and 55 minutes per day.
Meanwhile, millionaires’ earnings have quadrupled during the last 10 years.


Source: Prepared by Nubia Conde M with data from Forbes Magazine, several years of CEFP, the Bank of Mexico and SHCP, SAT.

On top of this, add up the job losses due to the closure of job sources. Among them, the criminal blow to the Mexican Electricians Union. The attack was led by the villainous secretary of work Javier Lozano Alarcón (who will also be remembered for his gangster-like extortions - Zhenli Ye Gon and the 205 million dollars that paid for the 2006 election fraud -), and was “applauded” by the mass media.
Certainly, the huge campaign against the workers of the Mexican Electricians Union (including the threat of penal actions against its leaders), which accuses them not only of being lazy, but at the same time of being terrorists, should compare itself with reality: if these workers were actually lazy and useless, how come the central zone of the country had electricity? How could the TV companies, radio stations and newspapers that now attack them and defame them operate? What about the deficiencies that, with the Federal Electricity Company, most of the homes in that part of Mexico are now facing? What about the ridiculously high new bills they are now getting?
Nonetheless, the resistance of these workers is not ignored. Not by us.
And while the world crisis is barely affecting the national economy, the political class continues in its idleness.
The year 2012 reached the calendar of those of above on December 1st 2006, and throughout all these 5 years it has only been proof that those past calendars are not even good for decorating the destroyed walls of this big house we still call “Mexico.”
In the PRI, a Beltrones and a Paredes are figuring out how to displace a Peña Nieto, who spends more time performing for the media (there is money involved) than in politics (he has no function).
In the PRD, the odd couple of López Obrador and Marcelo Ebrard are starting to realize that everything depends on the party bureaucracies of the self-styled institutional “left.”
Finally, in the PAN of the national nightmare, a little man, surrounded by death and destruction, is looking for someone to back him up now the presidential guards and the national palace will no longer do so.
Although the discredit and waste of the party in government is huge, Felipe Calderón Hinojosa is gambling, and gambling high, to use all the resources he can get hold of to impose his proposal. If he did it already in 2006, he could do it again in 2012. And he will need to, because his playing cards are worn out: a Cordero (lamb) promising his shepherd he’ll keep being a lamb; a Lujambio waiting to avoid the thrust of the stream of light; a Creel who looks good in grey (a colour that defines him); and a Vázquez Mota whose only argument is the fact that she is a woman.
(I recall an argument when Barack Obama and Hillary Rodham Clinton were running for the presidential candidacy. Some feminists were looking for support for Hillary because she was a woman; some Afro-Americans were supporting Obama because he was black. Time proved that above neither gender nor colour are important).
Meanwhile, like a brothel madam would do, Elba Esther Gordillo picks the leaves off the daisy…and she is still considering joining the race, instead of supporting someone else.
With such a pathetic panorama, it is only logical, and even expected, that other pre-candidates will show up…and with their own supporters.
In reality, the replacement government seems to interest no one, other than the party cliques, the economic power and an occasional militant.
Bitterness is replacing apathy, and not a few dreams finally bury the Mexican political system, and worker’s hands are engraving on its tomb the epitaph: “they did it the hard way, but the game is finally over.”
In the meantime the war continues…and with it, its victims…


III. Blaming the victim
In 1971, the north American psychologist William Ryan, wrote a book called “Blaming the Victim”. Although his initial intention was a criticism of the so-called “Moynihan Report”, which suggested that the black population of the USA were responsible for their own poverty due to their cultural patterns, rather than the social structure being to blame, this idea has been used more often to excuse acts of sexism and racism (even more so in rape cases, where the female is accused of provoking the rapist by her clothing, attitude, place, etc.)
Similarly, but using a different name, Theodor Adorno describes “Blaming the victim” as one of the defining characteristics of fascism.
In contemporary Mexico, the church, government, artists and people from the mainstream media, have used the same nonsense to condemn innocent victims (mainly women and young people).
Felipe Calderόn Hinojosa’s war has converted this characteristic of fascism into a whole programme of government and the dispensing of justice. Moreover, most of the media coverage holds to the same strategy, permeating through the minds of those who still believe what the newspapers, radio and television report.
Someone somewhere said that crimes against innocent people commit a triple injustice: death, guilt, and oblivion.
The whole system that we currently endure cares, keeps, and cultivates the killers and their names, whether it is to condemn or to glorify them.
However, the victim’s name and story are left behind.
Far beyond the victim’s relatives and friends, the victims are killed once again when they are reduced to a number, a statistic. Some others don’t even reach that.
In the war that Calderόn has imposed on the whole of Mexican society, across race, belief, social class, gender, political ideology, another grief is added: innocent victims are labeled as criminals.
The empire of impunity is disguised under the name of “settling of scores amongst narcos”.
And this heavy weight falls onto the relatives and friends too.
The reigning injustice not only guarantees impunity for all those working in the federal, state and municipal governments. It also overburdens the families and friends of the victims.
Other deaths are also their deaths, when society omits their names and stories. An honest life is distorted when [criminal] adjectives are lavished on those lives by the authorities and repeated ad nauseam by the media.
Then the victims of the war become the culprits and the crime of chopping their limbs off or killing them becomes a quasi-divine justice: “they asked for it”.
Felipe Calderόn Hinojosa will be remembered as a war criminal, even though today he is surrounded by embraces and congratulations, he thinks he is a great statesman, or the country’s saviour.
He will be remembered with bitterness.
It will even surpass the lack of justice, the derision and the usual scorn that follows the governor’s departure.
His pathetic imitation of a “tourist guide”, the illegality and illegitimacy of becoming president, his failed policies, his responsibility for the economic crisis, his surrounding of himself with a team of hitmen and security guards dressed in politician’s clothing; the nepotism that consolidates what is already known as the “los Piňos Cartel” , all these misrepresentations will be left in the background.
What will remain will be his war, lost, with its trail of collateral victims: the defeat, wearing down and discredit of the federal armed forces (which TV series could do very little to counter); the handing over of national sovereignty to the empire of stripes and blurred stars (we have said this before: the USA will be the sole winners of this war); the wiping out of local and regional economies; the breakdown of the social fabric; and innocent blood, always innocent blood…
It may be that death has no cure.
That nothing can fill the void of loneliness and despair that is left by the death of an innocent.
It may be that nothing can be done to bring back to life the tens of thousands of innocents killed in this war.
But one thing that can be done is to fight against this fascist idea of “blame the victim”, to name the dead and thus to recover their stories.
To free them from guilt and from oblivion.
To provide comfort for their absence.



IV. Naming the dead and their history

Mariano Anteros Cordero Gutierrez was his name. He was about 20 years old when, on June 25, 2009, he was murdered in Chihuahua.

When Mariano's father, Mariano Cordero Burciaga, met with the then governor of Chihuahua, José Reyes Baeza, the latter said that the murder had been the result of a street fight. A few weeks after the events, a representative of the College of State Lawyers of the Bar asked the appropriate authorities for an explanation of the facts. They said they had been "a settling of accounts between drug traffickers". Blame the victim.
Here are a few fragments of his story:

Mariano was studying at the Institute of Technology in Parral (ITP) for an engineering degree in business management and had received a letter of acceptance to study for a law degree at the Autonomous University of Durango in Spain, Parral Campus.

Prior to these studies he was a missionary volunteer at the Marist boarding school in the town of Chinatú, in the municipality of Guadalupe y Calvo, Chihuahua. He was responsible for 32 indigenous children in the primary section of this boarding school.

Mariano was a young Zapatista, one of those who struggle without masks. In March 2001, along with his father, he participated as a member of the ‘belt of peace’ during the March of the Colour of the Earth. In 2002, he took part in the various anti-globalization (altermundismo) demonstrations in Monterrey, Nuevo León, during a summit of heads of state attended by Bush but also by Fidel Castro. At the time of his death, Mariano kept in a bag for daily use a copy of the Sixth Declaration of the Lacandon Jungle, the Communist Party Manifesto and his most recently-acquired book, "Nights of Fire and Sleeplessness"

When we did our Other Campaign tour of northern Mexico, we passed through the state of Chihuahua, and the young Mariano attended a meeting. At the end of the meeting, he asked to speak with me alone.
What was the date? November 2, 2006. A few weeks earlier, on October 17 of that year, Mariano had reached the age of seventeen.

We sat in the same room where the meeting had been. More or less, what Mariano told me was that he wanted to come to live in a Zapatista community. He wanted to learn. I was surprised by his simplicity and humility, he did not say he wanted to come to help, but to learn.

I told the truth: that it was best to study for a college degree and to finish it, because here (and there and everywhere), people of honour finish what they have started; meanwhile they do not stop fighting, there in their land with their people.

That once he had finished his studies, if he still felt the same, he would have a place with us, but by our side, not as teacher or as a student, but as one of us.

We closed the deal with a handshake.

Seven years earlier, on May 8, 1999, when Mariano was 9, I had written him a message on a sheet of paper from a notebook:

"Mariano:The time will come, (not yet, but it will come, that is certain), when your path crosses others, and you have to choose one. When that time comes, look inside you and know that there are no options, there is only one answer: to be true to what you believe and say. If this is true, then the path and the speed of walking do not matter. What matters is the truth of the path walked".

Today we name Mariano, and his story, and from this geography we send his family a hug from his Zapatista brothers and sisters, which, although it will not cure it, will relieve the pain.



V. Judging or trying to understand?

From our geography we have also tried to follow closely the course of the Movement for Peace with Justice and Dignity that Javier Sicilia heads.

I know that judging and condemning or absolving is the way preferred by the commissioners of thought that appear on either side of the intellectual spectrum, but around here we think that one must make an effort to try to understand several things:

The first is that we’re dealing with a new movement that, in its project of becoming an organized movement, is constructing its own paths, with its own achievements and failures. Like anything new, we think it deserves respect. They can say, rightly, that the ways and means can be challenged, but not the causes.

And it deserves attention to try to comprehend, instead of making the summary judgments so dear to those who do not tolerate anything that is not under their direction.

And to respect and understand you have to look up, but also down below.

It’s true that above the shows of affection received by those directly responsible for so much death and destruction call attention and irritate.

But below we see that, in the family members and friends of the victims, awakens hope, comfort and companionship.

We thought maybe it was possible for a movement to rise up that would stop this absurd war. It doesn’t seem to be so (or not yet).

But what can be seen, of course, is that made tangible to the victims.

It lifted them out of the page of police reports, out of the statistics of the mythical "triumphs" of the government of Felipe Calderon Hinojosa, out of the blame, the forgetting.

Thanks to that mobilization, the victims begin to have a name and a history. And the hoax of the "fight against organized crime" falls apart.

For sure we still don’t understand the reason they spend so much energy and effort in dialogue with a political class that have long lost the will to govern and are nothing but a gang of outlaws. Perhaps they will discover this for themselves.

We do not judge and, therefore, neither do we condemn or absolve. We try to understand their steps and the longing that animates them.

In short, the dignified pain that embodies and moves them deserves and has our respect and admiration.

We think it is logical to dialogue with those responsible for the problems. In this war, it is reasonable to address those who unleashed it and escalated it. Critics of that dialogue with Felipe Calderón Hinojosa forget this fundamental.

Criticism of all kinds has rained on the forms that dialogue has taken.

I do not think that Javier Sicilia loses any sleep over the vile criticism of, for example, the Paty Chapoy of La Jornada, Jaime Avilés (just as frivolous and hysterical), or the vileness of Dr. ORA (who nowhere says that he is on the left or that he is congruent), who only lacks saying that Sicilia ordered the killing of his son to "push" the image of Felipe Calderon Hinojosa; or the signals that reproach him for not being radical, made precisely by those who hoist as an achievement "not having broken one pane of glass."

In his correspondence (and it seems to me in some public events), Javier Sicilia likes to recall a poem by Cavafy, especially the verse that says: "Thou shalt not fear either Laestrygonians or Cyclops, or the wrath of angry Poseidon." And these hysterical critics get nowhere near this, so that the bitterness of these pathetic little men does not reach beyond their few readers.

The reality is that this movement is doing something for the victims. And that is something that none of the "judges" can claim to do.

As for the rest, neither Javier Sicilia nor any of those close to him disdain the critical observations that they receive from the left, which are not few but are serious and respectful.

But one must not forget that they are observations, not orders.

I transcribe the end of one of the private letters that we have sent to him:

"Personally, if I may, I would tell him to continue with poetry, and art in general, at his side. In it are found stronger handles than those that seem to abound without rhyme or reason from the palaver of political "analysts”.

So I finish these lines with the words of John Berger:
‘I cannot tell you what art does and how it does it, but I know that art often prosecutes judges, cries out for vengeance for the innocent and projects into the future what the past has suffered, in a way that is never ever forgotten.

I also know that the powerful fear art, in any of its forms, when it does this, and that art sometimes runs like a rumour and a legend among the people because it gives meaning to what the brutality of life cannot, a meaning that unifies us, because in the end it is inseparable from justice. Art, when it functions like that, becomes the meeting place of the invisible, the irreducible, the enduring, the courage and the honour’ "

In the end, maybe all this will not come to be the case (or the thing, depending) .....





VI. A little story.
And perhaps this little story I am now going to tell you, Don Luis, will not come to be the case (or thing, depending,) either:
In the early morning of May 7, 2011, a column of vehicles left the zapatista Tzots Choj zone, ferrying men and women of the EZLN support bases to participate, along with people from other areas, in a demonstration in support of the Movement for Peace with Justice and Dignity headed by Javier Sicilia. At 6 o’clock, our compañero Roberto Santis Aguilar lost his life when one of the cars overturned in an accident. When he was very young, Robert became a Zapatista and chose "Dionisio" as his struggle name.

The story seems simple, when listening to it being told by his parents and his wife. His father says that Dionisio was the first member of his family to join the Zapatistas.
"So, since we were working here in the cornfield, the time came when we were chatting here in the cornfield, he looked to see that there was no one around and said, we'll talk a while, there is an organization, I heard it is very good. Then he started to say, he began to talk with us, with his brothers, then he began to say that there is this organization which is very good, it seems that there is help for us and this is what he said. So this is how we joined, but first we heard the word, and then we joined ourselves, it was gradually coming closer to all of the people. So, we joined the organization then.
We joined the organization at that time because we were very fucked up for living then, and there was no more land for us to work, we were very poor then. Then the bad government did this, we were talking about if there was a way to grab a piece of land, since there was no way the bloody government would give us one, so this organization heard we were on this path and then we joined this organization yes, we joined in the year, the year 1990, yes".
Four years later, now as a member of the Zapatista militia, compañero Dionisio, carrying a 20-gauge shotgun, was part of the regiment which took the municipalities of Altamirano, Chanal and Oxchuc. The government garrisons were defeated in those places, but afterwards Dionisio and other milicianos were taken prisoner and tortured by the PRI in Oxchuc.
You may remember, Don Luis, the images repeated ad nauseam by the national media and international organizations: the Zapatistas severely beaten, tied up in a building at the headquarters of Oxchuc, the PRI mob shouting and threatening to burn them alive. A government helicopter flew them to the Cerro Hueco prison, where they continued to be interrogated under torture. They had 15 days without food, with hardly any water, and being taken out at 4 in the morning to wash in cold water. He did not give them any information. He was released later, along with other Zapatista prisoners, in exchange for the Prisoner of War General Absalόn Castellanos.
There followed the Dialogue in the Cathedral, the Dialogue of San Andres, the signing of the accords, the government’s failure to ratify them, and the Zapatista resistance.
Tens of thousands of men, women, children and old people refused to receive government aid and began the process of building their autonomy through their own efforts and with the support of national and international civil society.

Compañero Dionisio was elected an authority of the Rebel Zapatista Autonomous Municipality and chairman of the commission of municipal production. When the Good Government Juntas were born, he was a member of one of them. Completing his community service as an autonomous authority, he remained a local promoter in his community.
His wife tells us how he fulfilled his duties:
“Before starting work the compañero said that it did not matter to him how much time he lost or if he would not earn enough money, not even the time when he was going to do the work and he did not mind that he would lose his time, even with pozol, because that's what he said before doing the work, that that is what our struggle needs. And he said that he was in himself quite convinced of the struggle, he did not want to give up, or mind whether there was any suffering, but he was quite convinced to fight. The compañero would like more work, would not mind if he had no money, but what he liked most is the work, and always when he goes out in the commission or in the council to work, many people there in the ejido were against the compañero, because work is what is making the organization, because, as an ejidatario he was always asked for a fine because he did not attend the meetings, doing other jobs in the community”.
When compañero Dionisio was doing his job as an autonomous authority, his wife stayed behind working in the cornfield or carrying firewood. And they shared the job: when the compañero returned from work in his office, he came home and the next day left at four or five in the morning to go to his work, either in the cornfield or other jobs, but always accompanied to work by his wife, and so they shared the work between them.
The day of the march, on May 7 this year, they got up at 2am and began to get ready: to grind the [flour for] dough for the tortillas, to prepare food to leave for the children, and to prepare pozol to take on the march. His wife says that whenever he went out to do work for the commission, Dionisio said he never knew whether he would return. That morning he left happily. The body of the compañero came back along with many Zapatista support bases.
They accompanied him back home.
When we spoke to the family of the late Dionisio, they asked us to pass these messages on to those who are struggling against the bad government’s war:
The father: this message is for compañero Javier Sicilia and other compañeros whose children have died as a result of looking for the good, then I send this message to encourage them in their struggle, so perhaps they can defeat the bad government.
The wife: this message to the compañero Javier Sicilia and other compañeros whose children have died, to encourage them in their struggle, not to stop fighting, the message is to fight together.
The mother: to keep struggling, their struggles and courage, as always with this situation if we are willing to fight it is going to happen, to continue to struggle, and they are not alone.


Truly, they are not alone.
The story of Dionisio is a simple one and, like that of all the Zapatistas can be summarized as follows: they neither surrendered nor sold out nor gave up.



-*Hmm ... it came out as a long letter. Imagine what will be sent to Don Pablo Gonzalez Casanova, to whom I owe not a letter but a book.
And now that I re-read it before sending, it occurs to me that all it says may not come to be the case as we reflect on ethics and politics.
Or perhaps it will?
Vale. Good health to you and hopefully there will be more effort put into understanding and less into judging.
From the mountains of the Mexican Southeast
Subcomandante Marcos
Mexico, July - August 2011

http://enlacezapatista.ezln.org.mx/2011/08/25/sci-marcos-tal-vez-carta-tercera-a-don-luis-villoro-en-el-intercambio-sobre-etica-y-politica/

Wednesday, August 3, 2011

Crow Indian parents seek justice for murdered son

Family says FBI agent was prejudiced toward Native Americans and failed to adequately investigate the murder of their son .

By Brenda Norrell
Censored News
http://www.bsnorrell.blogspot.com

SEATTLE -- A Native American family is in Seattle today, seeking justice in the murder of their son, Steven Bearcrane, murdered on Crow Indian land in 2005. The family said the FBI agent in the case did not adequately investigate the murder and treated the family "like we were wasting his time."

"There is so much to this murder that it frustrates any one when they hear the details. The pain of losing our son is hard to deal with; but when there is absolutely no justice for our son or our family, we as a family suffer in our grief. Although the evidence shows murder the FBI did a very poor investigation and the US Attorney’s Office accepted it 'as is,'" the family said in a message to Censored News.


"We are now in Seattle for our hearing in the Ninth Circuit on Thursday, Aug 4, at 9 a.m.  We had gotten a call late Monday from a woman who (we have never met) she said she heard about our case and is going to be at the court house with a banner and some others to meet us before we go in. WOW! this was very surprising! It is very comforting when others care," the family said.

Please see below the court documents and letter to the editor:
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The case is captioned Earline Cole v. Matthew Oravec, U.S. District Court case no.


CV-09-21-BLG-RFC-CFO, 9

th Circuit Court of Appeals case no. 11-35710.


Page 1 of 3


P

ATRICIA S. BANGERT


A

TTORNEY AT LAW, LLC


3773 Cherry Creek Drive North


Suite 575


Denver, Colorado 80209


Telephone: 303.228.217


Facsimile: 303.399.6480


Email:

pbangertlaw@aol.com


July 28, 2011


Honorable Michael W. Cotter


United States Attorney for Montana


2929 3

rd Avenue North


Billings, Montana 59102



Re


: Steven Bearcrane


Dear U.S. Attorney Cotter:


This requests that you ask the Bureau of Indian Affairs (“BIA”) to conduct an


investigation into the murder of Steven Bearcrane, a member of the Crow Tribe. Steven


Bearcrane, was shot in the head and killed on February 2, 2005, by a Caucasian co-worker on a


ranch on which both men worked, within the Crow Reservation. The co-worker claimed that he


killed Steven in self-defense after Steven allegedly came at him with a knife. The FBI agent


investigating the homicide, Special Agent Matt Oravec, agreed with the killer. Oravec even took


it upon himself to tell the Crime Victim’s Compensation staff that Steven’s relatives were not


entitled to assistance under the Victim’s Crime Act (Crime Victims’ Rights Act, 18 U.S.C.


§3771, and, 42 U.S.C. §10607 (Victims Rights and Restitution Act of 1990)), because Steven’s


murder was a case of self-defense. A review of the evidence available to Steven’s parents,


Earline and Cletus Cole, proves that Special Agent Oravec did an inadequate investigation in the


case, they believe, because of his animosity toward Native Americans.


Further, the parents of Steven Bearcrane and other reservation members have filed suit


against the FBI and the U.S. Attorney’s Office in South Dakota alleging violations of equal


protection arising out of the agencies’ discriminatory provision of law enforcement services


(investigative and prosecutorial) to Native Americans.

1 Since the filing of that case, the FBI and


U.S. Attorney’s Office refuse to follow-up on new evidence in the case. Steven’s killer has not


been prosecuted and Steven’s mother, daughter and other family have to see him in town.


Page 2 of 3


Representative of the evidence showing inadequate investigation and prosecution is the


following: Crime-scene photographs show Steven lying in a pool of blood on the floor of the


ranch trailer in which he was killed. The knife with which Steven supposedly attacked the killer


was lying

in its sheath under an electrical cord, under the left side of Steven’s body (Steven was


right-handed). To believe that Steven’s killer acted in self-defense, Special Agent Oravec had to


believe that the knife was magical and somehow flew out of Steven’s hand back into its sheath,


and, then, flew under Steven’s body. Rather than believe in magical knives, it is more


reasonable to infer that Oravec has animosity toward Native Americans, such as Steven


Bearcrane, that affects his actions in cases involving Native American victims. In fact, Oravec


has been heard making disparaging remarks about Native Americans.


While in the Montana FBI Field Office, Special Agent Oravec exhibited the same


disregard of Native American victims in other cases. In the Springfield case, Robert Springfield


went on a hunting trip on the reservation and never came back. The FBI refused to investigate


his disappearance. When Mr. Springfield’s body was found many months later, the FBI refused


to investigate his death even though there were several persons who wanted to give statements.


Further, Oravec delayed Springfield’s identification, thus depriving the family of Social Security


death benefits.


Perhaps most disturbing is the FBI’s refusal to consider substantial new evidence about


Steven Bearcrane’s killing. Last winter, new evidence emerged about Steven’s murder and


Oravec’s animosity toward Native Americans. Specifically, a non-Indian woman who was also


working on the ranch the day of Steven’s murder executed an affidavit.

See attached affidavit.


In that affidavit, among other things, the co-worker stated that a month or so before Steven’s


murder, his killer bragged about being a sniper, and that could kill someone and make it look


like self-defense.” The co-worker stated that the ranch foreman had entered the trailer right after


Steven was murdered and saw no knife near his body, but did observe that a knife had been


planted later. She stated that the killer had a very aggressive dog who would not let anyone near


him if the dog felt that the killer was threatened. The co-worker stated that she tried to tell these


things to Special Agent Oravec, but that he cut her off and commented that “Indians can’t hold


their liquor and drugs.” She said that she tried to tell these facts to the Grand Jury but that the


Assistant U.S. Attorney, Maura Kohn, would not allow her to testify regarding these issues.


I sent that affidavit to Shon Hastings, an attorney representing the FBI and the U.S.


Attorney’s Office in the civil case, months ago. As far as I know, neither the FBI nor the U.S.


Attorney’s Office has taken any action with regard to the new evidence. I also sent the affidavit


to Edward Himmelfarb, the attorney representing the Department of Justice in the civil case


brought by Steven’s parents to force the FBI to treat Native American crime victims the same as


Caucasian crime victims. His only response was that the United States would not allow the


federal court to see the affidavit.


It is hard to understand, as a practical and ethical matter, why there has been such


reluctance, as well as active resistance by the Department of Justice (“DOJ”), and its agency, the


Page 3 of 3


FBI, to fully investigate Steven’s murder. It is even harder to understand why that reluctance and


active resistance continues after the agencies received the affidavit from Steven’s co-worker, a


person who has no interest in the murder other than to see justice furthered. The only conclusion


one can draw from these facts is that animosity against Native Americans is institutionalized in


some DOJ offices.


Further, it is this kind of disregard and disrespect for Native American crime victims that


has contributed to the horrendous and unforgivable crime on reservations: the most recent Bureau


of Justice Statistics report showed that: (a) from 1976 to 2001 an estimated 3,738 American


Indians were murdered; (b) among American Indians age 25 to 34, the rate of violent crime


victimizations was more than 2½ times the rate for all persons the same age; and (c) rates of


violent victimization for both males and females were higher for American Indians than for all


races.

See American Indians and Crime: A BJS Statistical Profile, 1992-2002, 12/04 NCJ


203097). The highest crime rate

per capita occurs on Indian reservations. See Testimony of


Hon. Anthony Brandenburg, Chief Judge, Intertribal Court of Southern California before the


Senate Committee on Indian Affairs, regarding a Legislative Hearing on S. 797, the Tribal Law


Enforcement Act of 2009, June 25, 2009. A report released by the Department of Justice found


that Native American women suffer violent crime at a rate three and a half times greater than the


national average (

Native American Women and Violence, Lisa Bhungalia, National NOW Times,


Spring, 2001); in fact, one in three Native American women will be raped in their lifetime and 75


percent of perpetrators of those crimes are non-Indian (

See American Indians and Crime: A BJS



Statistical Profile


, 1992-2002, 12/04 NCJ 203097). Even the human rights group “Amnesty


International” has documented the deplorable lack of investigation and prosecution of sexual


abuse involving Native Americans.

See, for example,



http://www.amnestyusa.org/document.php?id=ENGAMR510352007

.


Because of their concerns that the FBI or other parts of the Department of Justice can be


impartial or can perform an adequate investigation, Earline and Cletus Cole respectfully request


that you ask the BIA Law Enforcement Services to conduct an investigation into Steven


Bearcrane’s murder. The Coles believe that the criminal investigators within the BIA may be


able to provide valuable assistance to the DOJ in determining whether prosecution is warranted


in Steven’s murder. Please feel free to contact me if you wish to discuss the matters contained


herein. Thank you.


Sincerely,


Patricia S. Bangert


cc: Honorable Ken Salazar, Secretary, DOI


Honorable Larry Echo Hawk, Assistant Secretary, BIA

Darren Cruzan, Deputy Bureau Director, OJS--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------


July 15, 2011
Dear Editor


My name is Cletus Cole and I am an enrolled member or the Gros Ventre Tribe of Fort Belknap.  I am married and have a home in the rural area of Billings, Montana.  This home is located 11 miles out and within the boundaries of the Crow Reservation. 
My wife Earline and I have 1 daughter and 4 sons, one of which we have lost one in the most tragic way imaginable.  Earline and our children are all enrolled members of the Crow Tribe. 

Steven, the son we lost, is the reason for this letter.  Steven was at work when he was shot and killed on February 2, 2005, and the shooter is a non-Indian and was never charged with anything or never spent one night in jail.  This happened down the road from our home where Steven was employed as a ranch hand. 

There is so much to this murder that it frustrates any one when they hear the details. The pain of losing our son is hard to deal with; but when there is absolutely no justice for our son or our family, we as a family suffer in our grief.  Although the evidence shows murder the FBI did a very poor investigation and the US Attorney’s Office accepted it “as is.”

The FBI agent assigned to the Crow Reservation at that time always treated Indian victims and their families with no worth or importance.  The agent showed us no concern when meeting at the FBI office with us about Steven’s case.  In fact, the agent acted like we were wasting his time. 
We filed a civil case claiming racial discrimination against the FBI and the US Attorney’s office of South Dakota in the Federal District Court in Billings to try to get the court to order them to do their jobs in regard to Indian victims of crime.  The FBI and DOJ and their employees claimed sovereign immunity.  However, the court would not let the FBI agent claim sovereign immunity but everyone else was able to.  In other words, sacrifice the lowest man on the totem pole.  The FBI agent through the DOJ is now appealing in the 9th Circuit court and our court date for oral arguments is Aug. 4, 2011 at 9:00 a.m. in Seattle WA. 


We as Indian people know firsthand what prejudice is and when the offices that should protect us and administer “JUSTICE FOR ALL” do not do this, then that leaves us as “Vulnerable Victims of All” people who want to commit crimes against Indians.  Crime happens everywhere but, as you know, it is most rampant on reservations. 
The MSU-Missoula journalism school picks an issue to investigate and sends teams out to investigate and write a magazine which is published every May and distributed in the Great Falls paper.  Crime on reservations was the topic of 2009 there was a story from every Montana reservation.  The story of Steven’s murder was the cover and center-page story and told of all the extremes measures we have done to pursue justice.  Going to the 9th Circuit Court is another is another endeavor we are doing in the hopes of achieving justice. 


Injustice is not only in Montana but we have found along the way that reservations in other states also experience this.  This case will set precedence for all Indian people in the 9th circuit states over the treatment of Indian victims and we feel it is very important to have as much support as can be given.  We are asking if any person or persons would come and attend the hearing and make their presence to be seen at this hearing.  Your attendance will show the 9th Circuit Court Judges the seriousness of the injustice done to Indians and that injustice because of our race is wrong.
Sincerely,   


Cletus and Earline Cole

1

The case is captioned Earline Cole v. Matthew Oravec, U.S. District Court case no.

CV-09-21-BLG-RFC-CFO, 9

th Circuit Court of Appeals case no. 11-35710.

Page 1 of 3


P

ATRICIA S. BANGERT

A

TTORNEY AT LAW, LLC

3773 Cherry Creek Drive North
Suite 575
Denver, Colorado 80209


Telephone: 303.228.217
Facsimile: 303.399.6480
Email:

pbangertlaw@aol.com

July 28, 2011
Honorable Michael W. Cotter
United States Attorney for Montana
2929 3

rd Avenue North

Billings, Montana 59102



Re


: Steven Bearcrane

Dear U.S. Attorney Cotter:
This requests that you ask the Bureau of Indian Affairs (“BIA”) to conduct an
investigation into the murder of Steven Bearcrane, a member of the Crow Tribe. Steven
Bearcrane, was shot in the head and killed on February 2, 2005, by a Caucasian co-worker on a
ranch on which both men worked, within the Crow Reservation. The co-worker claimed that he
killed Steven in self-defense after Steven allegedly came at him with a knife. The FBI agent
investigating the homicide, Special Agent Matt Oravec, agreed with the killer. Oravec even took
it upon himself to tell the Crime Victim’s Compensation staff that Steven’s relatives were not
entitled to assistance under the Victim’s Crime Act (Crime Victims’ Rights Act, 18 U.S.C.
§3771, and, 42 U.S.C. §10607 (Victims Rights and Restitution Act of 1990)), because Steven’s
murder was a case of self-defense. A review of the evidence available to Steven’s parents,
Earline and Cletus Cole, proves that Special Agent Oravec did an inadequate investigation in the
case, they believe, because of his animosity toward Native Americans.
Further, the parents of Steven Bearcrane and other reservation members have filed suit
against the FBI and the U.S. Attorney’s Office in South Dakota alleging violations of equal
protection arising out of the agencies’ discriminatory provision of law enforcement services
(investigative and prosecutorial) to Native Americans.

1 Since the filing of that case, the FBI and

U.S. Attorney’s Office refuse to follow-up on new evidence in the case. Steven’s killer has not
been prosecuted and Steven’s mother, daughter and other family have to see him in town.
Page 2 of 3
Representative of the evidence showing inadequate investigation and prosecution is the
following: Crime-scene photographs show Steven lying in a pool of blood on the floor of the
ranch trailer in which he was killed. The knife with which Steven supposedly attacked the killer
was lying

in its sheath under an electrical cord, under the left side of Steven’s body (Steven was

right-handed). To believe that Steven’s killer acted in self-defense, Special Agent Oravec had to
believe that the knife was magical and somehow flew out of Steven’s hand back into its sheath,
and, then, flew under Steven’s body. Rather than believe in magical knives, it is more
reasonable to infer that Oravec has animosity toward Native Americans, such as Steven
Bearcrane, that affects his actions in cases involving Native American victims. In fact, Oravec
has been heard making disparaging remarks about Native Americans.
While in the Montana FBI Field Office, Special Agent Oravec exhibited the same
disregard of Native American victims in other cases. In the Springfield case, Robert Springfield
went on a hunting trip on the reservation and never came back. The FBI refused to investigate
his disappearance. When Mr. Springfield’s body was found many months later, the FBI refused
to investigate his death even though there were several persons who wanted to give statements.
Further, Oravec delayed Springfield’s identification, thus depriving the family of Social Security
death benefits.
Perhaps most disturbing is the FBI’s refusal to consider substantial new evidence about
Steven Bearcrane’s killing. Last winter, new evidence emerged about Steven’s murder and
Oravec’s animosity toward Native Americans. Specifically, a non-Indian woman who was also
working on the ranch the day of Steven’s murder executed an affidavit.

See attached affidavit.

In that affidavit, among other things, the co-worker stated that a month or so before Steven’s
murder, his killer bragged about being a sniper, and that could kill someone and make it look
like self-defense.” The co-worker stated that the ranch foreman had entered the trailer right after
Steven was murdered and saw no knife near his body, but did observe that a knife had been
planted later. She stated that the killer had a very aggressive dog who would not let anyone near
him if the dog felt that the killer was threatened. The co-worker stated that she tried to tell these
things to Special Agent Oravec, but that he cut her off and commented that “Indians can’t hold
their liquor and drugs.” She said that she tried to tell these facts to the Grand Jury but that the
Assistant U.S. Attorney, Maura Kohn, would not allow her to testify regarding these issues.
I sent that affidavit to Shon Hastings, an attorney representing the FBI and the U.S.
Attorney’s Office in the civil case, months ago. As far as I know, neither the FBI nor the U.S.
Attorney’s Office has taken any action with regard to the new evidence. I also sent the affidavit
to Edward Himmelfarb, the attorney representing the Department of Justice in the civil case
brought by Steven’s parents to force the FBI to treat Native American crime victims the same as
Caucasian crime victims. His only response was that the United States would not allow the
federal court to see the affidavit.
It is hard to understand, as a practical and ethical matter, why there has been such
reluctance, as well as active resistance by the Department of Justice (“DOJ”), and its agency, the
Page 3 of 3
FBI, to fully investigate Steven’s murder. It is even harder to understand why that reluctance and
active resistance continues after the agencies received the affidavit from Steven’s co-worker, a
person who has no interest in the murder other than to see justice furthered. The only conclusion
one can draw from these facts is that animosity against Native Americans is institutionalized in
some DOJ offices.
Further, it is this kind of disregard and disrespect for Native American crime victims that
has contributed to the horrendous and unforgivable crime on reservations: the most recent Bureau
of Justice Statistics report showed that: (a) from 1976 to 2001 an estimated 3,738 American
Indians were murdered; (b) among American Indians age 25 to 34, the rate of violent crime
victimizations was more than 2½ times the rate for all persons the same age; and (c) rates of
violent victimization for both males and females were higher for American Indians than for all
races.

See American Indians and Crime: A BJS Statistical Profile, 1992-2002, 12/04 NCJ

203097). The highest crime rate

per capita occurs on Indian reservations. See Testimony of

Hon. Anthony Brandenburg, Chief Judge, Intertribal Court of Southern California before the
Senate Committee on Indian Affairs, regarding a Legislative Hearing on S. 797, the Tribal Law
Enforcement Act of 2009, June 25, 2009. A report released by the Department of Justice found
that Native American women suffer violent crime at a rate three and a half times greater than the
national average (

Native American Women and Violence, Lisa Bhungalia, National NOW Times,

Spring, 2001); in fact, one in three Native American women will be raped in their lifetime and 75
percent of perpetrators of those crimes are non-Indian (

See American Indians and Crime: A BJS


Statistical Profile


, 1992-2002, 12/04 NCJ 203097). Even the human rights group “Amnesty

International” has documented the deplorable lack of investigation and prosecution of sexual
abuse involving Native Americans.

See, for example,


http://www.amnestyusa.org/document.php?id=ENGAMR510352007

.

Because of their concerns that the FBI or other parts of the Department of Justice can be
impartial or can perform an adequate investigation, Earline and Cletus Cole respectfully request
that you ask the BIA Law Enforcement Services to conduct an investigation into Steven
Bearcrane’s murder. The Coles believe that the criminal investigators within the BIA may be
able to provide valuable assistance to the DOJ in determining whether prosecution is warranted
in Steven’s murder. Please feel free to contact me if you wish to discuss the matters contained
herein. Thank you.
Sincerely,
Patricia S. Bangert
cc: Honorable Ken Salazar, Secretary, DOI
Honorable Larry Echo Hawk, Assistant Secretary, BIA
Darren Cruzan, Deputy Bureau Director, OJS----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF MONTANA

BILLINGS DIVISION

EARLINE COLE, as an individual and as )

personal representative of the )

ESTATE OF STEVEN BEARCRANE, )

CLETUS COLE, as an individual and )

as personal representative of the )

ESTATE OF STEVEN BEARCRANE, )

PRECIOUS BEARCRANE, minor child, )

VERONICA SPRINGFIELD, as an )

individual and as personal )

representative of the )

ESTATE OF ROBERT, SPRINGFIELD )

and )

VELMA SPRINGFIELD, minor child, )

Plaintiffs, )

)

)

)

)) )

)

)

)

)

)

)

)

----------------------------~)

v.

FEDERAL BUREAU OF

INVESTIGATIONS, SALT

LAKE FIELD OFFICE,

UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS

OFFICE FOR SOUTH DAKOTA,

ERNEST WEYAND, in his official and

individual capacities,

and

MATTHEW ORAVEC, in his individual

capacity,

Defendants.

CV-09-21-BLG-RFC-CFO

AFFIDAVIT OF

KASSANDRA LEACHMAN

I, Kassandra Leachman, state that I have personal knowledge of and am competent

to testify about the facts stated in this affidavit, and state as follows:

1. I was employed by Black Ranches, the parent company to Leachman

Hairpin Cavvy, from March 2004 to November 2005 as a ranch hand
. Iwas employed in

that capacity and at work on February 2. 2005. the day Steven Bearcrane, also a ranch

hand, was shot by Bob Holcomb, another ranch hand.

2. At the Christmas party prior to the murder of Steven Bearcrane, Holcomb

was bragging about how he was a sniper and how he could kill a person and make it look

like he had done so in self defense. He seemed to almost brag about how he would only

need one bullet, as he would be sure and make it a kill shot right between the eyes.

3. At around noon on the day Steven was killed, another employee and I went

into the trailer in which Holcomb was staying to make lunch. The Company allowed

employees free access to the trailer. The trailer was about 50 yards from the barn. While

there, I saw a loaded handgun in a holster on the dining room table, something that was

unusual to me.

4. Around noon on February 2, 2005, Bob Holcomb and Steven Bearcrane

went out with their two horses in a trailer to tend to horses that were pastured

approximately 1.5 miles from the sale barn. Later, I saw Holcomb come back to the barn

with his horse in the trailer. Holcomb threw his saddle in a truck and went right to the

trailer without saying anything to me or other employees.

5. A little later, Steven came back to the barn riding bareback on his horse.

He got off the horse to get the gate, and then, back on to ride the rest of the way to the

2

barn. I have seen many people attempt to ride or mount a horse while impaired. Steven

did not appear to be impaired in any way, especially because he was riding bareback and

was able to get back on after going through the gate without any trouble or assistance.

6. Steven put his horse away and walked up to the trailer. The ranch foreman,

Rodger Reitman, went up to the trailer a short time later. When he came out, he said that

Holcomb had shot Steven.

7. Reitman went back into the trailer. When he came out, he told me that

there was a knife under Steven's body near his offhand. Reitman said that the knife had

not been there the first time he had gone into the trailer after Steven was shot. Reitman

said that the knife had been planted.

8. Approximately 2 hours later, the Yellowstone Sheriff s deputies arrived.

They put up police tape that they took down two days later.

9. Matt Oravec from the FBI came out to the ranch several days after the

murder. We met in his truck. I wanted to tell him what I knew about Steven's murder,

but, he did not want to listen. He told me that Steven's alcohol and drug levels were "off

the chart" and said that "Indians can't hold their liquor and drugs." He said that they

have a genetic and allergic reaction to alcohol. Oravec wouldn't let me elaborate on any

of the points I was trying to make. He was very intimidating. I got the impression that

his interviewing me was a formality, and that he already had his mind made that Steven

was to blame for his own murder.

3

10. Later
, I testified in front of a grand jury. Again, I wanted to tell my story,

but
, the prosecutor, Maura Kohn, asked questions in a way that prevented me from

telling the whole story or elaborating on any points. I testified for about 15 minutes. I

have not been contacted by any other government official.

11. I do not believe that Steven attacked Bob Holcomb on February 2, 2005.

Steven Bearcrane was a kind and gentle man, who I would describe as a "horse

whisperer." I never saw him out of control or violent. He was a good worker who

provided for his family and he was a great father.

12. Also, Holcomb had a very mean and aggressive dog who attacked

everyone. There is no way that the dog would have allowed Steven to attack Holcome.

I swear or affirm that the foregoing facts are true to the best of my knowledge,

information and belief.


DATED

this F-I day ofAtly, 2010~0£0


5..
t?pfflKP.er


-

-- Kassandra Leachman

4


STATE OF TE

XAS )


)

ss:


C

OUNTY OF /dtUtW )


.

Subscribed and sworri to before me by Kassandra Leachman this IJ day of


~.20

10. ~~~ '


-
$~LP~..YYL0.e r


W

itness my Hand and Official Seal


My

Commission Expires on:

5

Censored News Blog Radio

Donate to Censored News

. Censored News is free of advertising and has no sponsors.

Censored News Homepage

About Censored News


Censored News is published by censored journalist Brenda Norrell. A journalist for 27 years, Brenda lived on the Navajo Nation for 18 years, writing for Navajo Times, AP, USA Today, Lakota Times and other American Indian publications. After being censored and then terminated by Indian Country Today in 2006, she began the Censored Blog to document the most censored issues. She currently serves as human rights editor for the U.N. OBSERVER & International Report at the Hague and contributor to Sri Lanka Guardian, Narco News and CounterPunch. She was cohost of the 5-month Longest Walk Talk Radio across America, with Earthcycles Producer Govinda Dalton in 2008: www.earthcycles.net/
COPYRIGHTS All material is copyrighted by the author or photographer. Please contact each contributor for reprint permission. brendanorrell@gmail.com
Audios may not be sold or used for commercial purposes.

"O FRIEND! In the garden of thy heart plant naught but the rose of love, and from the nightingale of affection and desire loosen not thy hold." --Baha'u'llah, Baha'i Faith